首页> 外文OA文献 >Validity and Reliability of Three Rating Scales to Assess Practitioners’ Skills to Conduct Collaborative, Strength-Based, Systemic Work in Family-Based Services
【2h】

Validity and Reliability of Three Rating Scales to Assess Practitioners’ Skills to Conduct Collaborative, Strength-Based, Systemic Work in Family-Based Services

机译:三个评定量表的有效性和可靠性,以评估从业人员的家庭服务协作行为,基于力量,系统工作的技能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study analyzed the reliability and validity of three rating scales designed to assess practitioners’ skills in conducting systemic, collaborative, and strength-based assessments and interventions with multi-challenged families in family-based community services. The three scales, which assess reception and assessment skills, basic skills, and skills to support change, revealed good psychometric properties considering their construct validity, internal consistency, and inter-rater agreement. The results are discussed considering future research and possible applications of the scales in research and practice.
机译:这项研究分析了三个评估量表的信度和效度,这三个量表旨在评估从业者在家庭式社区服务中对多方面挑战家庭进行系统,协作和基于力量的评估和干预的技能。评估接收和评估技能,基本技能和支持变化的技能的三个量表显示出良好的心理测量特性,考虑到其构造效度,内部一致性和评估者之间的一致性。讨论结果时考虑了将来的研究以及该量表在研究和实践中的可能应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号